I remember being in elementary school and learning about the
different life cycles in my science class.
I remember learning about the water cycle, and how precipitation
eventually turns into evaporation. I
also remember learning about photosynthesis and how plants need sunlight and
carbon dioxide in order to grow and give off oxygen. Who would have known there would be so much
importance placed on this later in life, and that it should be considered in
designing all things? It is the basic knowledge we learn when we are younger
that most people forget to apply later in life.
A little science review
Nature is something that is meant to last for millions of
years because it is always evolving into new forms. Our ecosphere consists of four layers, the atmospphere,
biosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere.
We as consumers use these spheres to produce all materials. As stated in The Designer’s Atlas of Sustainability by Anna Thorpe, “ Estimates
are that it takes one-third of a pound of lithosphere chemicals to produce a
cotton shirt (Thorpe 24).” This is just
to make the shirt. This does not include the chemicals used to grow the cotton
or the amount of times you wash the shirt after you purchase it. An ecosystem maintains a balanced cycle by
using a metabolism, or life maintaining process. This goes back to the basic science life
cycles such as the carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, and water cycle, which we were all taught in elementary school.
Consumer Destruction
We as consumers are destroying the natural lifecycles by
creating materials, which do not apply to the same concept as nature, of
evolving into newer forms. As stated in The
Designer’s Atlas of Sustainability by Ann Thorpe, “We would need three or
four planet Earths to sustain the world’s population at the current lifestyles
of Western countries (Thorpe 29).” We
are disrupting the nature’s cycles by using materials too quickly, discarding
large amounts of materials, and taking more material from the lithosphere and
putting it back into other spheres where they do not belong. As stated in The Designer’s Atlas of Sustainability,
“One thousand new chemicals are introduced each year. Most of these chemicals have not been tested
on human health, but like other processed lithosphere materials, they will end
up somewhere in our biosphere (Thorpe 31).”
In the video, Case study of C2C
and Roehner Textiles, the chemicals used to die their fabrics were tested
only to determine they caused cancer, birth defects, immune system disruption,
soil and water toxicity, and they found that of the 1600 dies sold, only
sixteen of them were not harmful. Out of
these sixteen dies they were able to make virtually any color and still remain
competitive. This only proves that it is
possible to make a change and still maintain a good business.
Solutions to Sustainability
An alternative to down-cycling in
order to save our ecosystem is up-cycling.
Up-cycling is when materials are remade into a high-quality material.
Most of these materials would be made from a pure substance so that they could
be easily sorted and up-cycled. This
method eliminates the dangers of contaminants.
The retail store Patagonia is making an effort toward Up-cycling by
providing a place where customers can bring their old apparel into their store
to be recycled into new clothes with the same value. Below is a video of a creative way to up-cycle.
Designers
today find a tremendous amount of inspiration for their designs from nature. Why can’t we include nature from the
beginning of our designs life, to the end? If we as designers consider our
designs like the basic life cycles we were taught in elementary school, we
would be able to make a difference and change the decline in our
ecosphere.
A few Restricted Substance
·
AAFA
o Arylamines-
Often used in hair dyes, sunscreen, photographic additives, and temporary
tattoos.
§
Cause allergic contact dermatitis to people
o Asbestos-
found in manufactured goods such as shingles, ceiling and floor tiles, paper
and cement products, textiles and coatings,
and friction products such as automobile clutch, brake and transmission
parts.
§
Risk of developing lung disease, asbestosis, and
mesothelioma.
o Dioxins
and Furans- created when products like herbicides are made
§
Can cause cancer, changes in hormone levels, and
decreased ability to reproduce
·
GOTS
o Aromatic
Solvents- used in commercial applications such as industrial solvents and
chemical intermediates.
§
Can cause depressant effects to the central
nervous system, irritation, nausea, and unconsciousness.
o Chlorophenols-
very low levels in drinking water.
§
In large amounts can cause cancer, skin
irritation such as swelling scabbing and scar formation.
Industry Efforts Toward Sustainability
·
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
(LEED) and Center on Ecotourism and Sustainable Development (CESD)
·
Cradle to Cradle (C2C)

Hi, Rachel; You have done a nice job of discussing recycling/upcycling/downcycling and the threat that contaminants have to this design potential. Your blog is also well written and organized. When you researched these restricted contaminants, do you get the sense that these could be phased out easily and therefore, help design be better poised for C2C? What are the issues there? Also, how did the McDonough and Braungart reading influence your thinking this week?
ReplyDeleteDr. Armstrong,
DeleteThank you for the comment. I do believe that just like in the video about Roehner Textiles, if you have a strong enough desire to make changes by eliminating harmful chemicals in production, you will find a way around it. I am not saying that it will be easy. It was not easy for Roehner Textiles, but they did not give up, and later found they were able to produce just as much fabric without the harmful chemicals and still remain competitive. I do believe that if they continue to phase these contaminants out, it will help push design further toward C2C.
I did not include a lot from the McDonough and Braungart reading because I have always been taught by my grandparents to not waste things, becuase they used everything down to the bag the flower came in for dresses. In today's society a lot of people take advantage of what they have and are very wasteful. I believe everyone is aware of how wasteful we are, but they are uninformed on how to make the changes by using C2C, up-cycling, and down-cycling.
Rachel,
ReplyDeleteFirst, I really enjoy reading your blog because you explain things very well, and in a manner that readers can easily understand. I like that you added the "science" section to your blog for some background.
In regards to your example of up-cycling by Patagonia, do you think consumer's perception of the quality of the goods is lowered because they arent "new" products?
Good Job!!
Shelby,
DeleteI'm glad you enjoyed reading my blog. To answer your question, I believe in today's society less emphasis is put on the quality of the clothing, for example all the popular "fast fashion" clothing stores such as rue 21 and forever 21. With that being said, the consumer would be less likely to consider the recycled clothing as "used" because it is new with tags. In my opinion the idea of owning an up-cycled shirt would replace the thought of having something with lower quality.
Rachel,
ReplyDeleteWonderful job this week incorporating all the reading and video material into a cohesive and easy to follow post! Like Shelby said, its very organized and well explained! I like that you included there are multiple solutions to sustainability, this shows that people have options of getting involved in different ways. During this learning process have you caught yourself making everyday changes? Keep up the good work! :)
Kathryn,
DeleteI'm glad my blog was easy for you to read. To answer your question, yes! I went to a wedding this weekend and at the end of the wedding, during the send off of the bride and groom, they chose to let balloons go instead of blowing bubbles, or other traditions. I caught myself wondering where these balloons would end up, and the effects they would have on the ecosphere. It's crazy how many bad things we as consumers do to our earth and do not even realize it.
That's so funny you mention that! I just went to a weekend this past weekend also and we all were getting our hair done and they were loading on the hair spray. I know in the past it was bad for the environment but it makes me wonder how it isn't bad now? Or is it? People don't ever question these things because it becomes the normal way of life.
DeleteRachel,
ReplyDeleteAs both Shelby and Kathryn have mentioned great job incorporating everything from this week into you blog! I also enjoyed how you managed to put in a little science class and made it easy for the readers to understand. The retail store Patagonia, that creates their clothing from recycled soda bottles, while it is a great way to up-cycle it can also be harmful to the wearers after long exposure. How is this any better than the Roehner Textiles and the chemicals in the dies that caused cancer, birth defects, immune system disruption, soil and water toxicity?
Holly,
DeleteThank you for your comments. I'm glad you enjoyed the science paragraph. You have asked a very interesting question. After reading The Designers Atlas of Sustainability which states that recycled bottles contain harmful chemicals, it leads me to believe that the retail store Patagonia is not aware of these harmful chemicals, and are just more concerned with the concept of recycling. I would consider these effects to be closely related to the ones in Roehner Textiles.
Holly,
DeleteThank you for your comments. I'm glad you enjoyed the science paragraph. You have asked a very interesting question. After reading The Designers Atlas of Sustainability which states that recycled bottles contain harmful chemicals, it leads me to believe that the retail store Patagonia is not aware of these harmful chemicals, and are just more concerned with the concept of recycling. I would consider these effects to be closely related to the ones in Roehner Textiles.